Tuesday, January 29, 2013

Cars Are No Good

It is very difficult for me to begin to address the concept of Utopia in the first place. When I think about it, I just wind up in a never ending argument going back and forth about ways to approach the "problem" of improving the world. One side of me says that to make the world a better place, we have to consider for what purpose we are making the world a better place. If it is to give all humans better lives, than we have to think about whether we equally weigh all humans' opinions about what gives them better lives, whether anybody is wrong about what is a good life, and find ways to address the differences in the ways people want to live.

It all just really comes down to a philosophical discussion on the meaning of life, which has remained unresolved for a very long time. So when I get the question, "What is one thing that would make the world a better place?", I think to myself that I want everyone to live life the way they want so that they fulfill what they want to do with their life. And then I think that basically our world is already our attempt at Utopia and that it is perfect within all of it's "imperfections"- or maybe disagreements would be a better word.

So obviously everybody views it differently, which just seems to make the whole concept contradictory. But I guess to address it, I will assume that people misunderstand what will allow them to lead a better life, and that I can point them in the right direction.

My idea for a better world is to abandon vehicles of any kind. I believe that humans, similarly to any other animals, are meant to move without the assistance of a metal box on wheels.

For the record, I would like to say that I enjoy looking at and driving cool cars. I go through stretches in which I get really set on buying something like a Trans Am, but for the benefit of everyone I think it would be best if we did without them.

Back to cars being bad. The only purpose I see that they serve is for more things that make the world worse off. It all just comes down to cars facilitating our economy, which is based on us buying things that we don't actually need, which is done with MONEY, which many agree the world would be a better place without!

So now that we see the only things cars are used for are bad things, we can look at unintended consequences of their use.  Many people die from zooming around on our paved roads in metal boxes. Although I know it could be argued that death is not necessarily a bad thing in and of itself, I am assuming that while we are here we want to remain alive with healthy bodies. The other major consequence is people being very unhealthy from not having to move around the way we are meant to. I guess maybe being unhealthy doesn't seem like that terrible of a thing, but when I think about it, our bodies should be the one thing we want to protect above all else, so being unhealthy is basically the worst thing imaginable.

There are people who don't exercise, eat unhealthy, and drive around a lot, but are still skinny.  I just wanted to clarify that being skinny is not equivalent to health.

I basically see the purpose of life as enjoying my time while i'm alive. The only things I really want out of life are to be able to eat, maintain a comfortable body temperature, and be around the people that I enjoy. I have known nearly all of my good friends for over 10 years. I'm sure that is very different from people who go to college and have new friends in three weeks. I don't consider myself close to someone until I have known them for a considerable amount of time. This is why I find it ridiculous that people would want cars and planes to travel and spend time with their "friends" who live in places like Italy, Mongolia, and Ghana.

I do not think that cars improve our lives at all.

8 comments:

  1. I like the idea of getting people up and moving, but what about emergency situations, like a person getting transported via ambulance? Also, my mind wanders to those in arctic climates who could potentially freeze by not having a quick means of transportation.

    Makes me wonder how people managed to get around in the "olden days"; I can't imagine not having a car to get me from point A to point B.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that the number of lives saved as a result of the elimination of vehicles would outweigh the loss of life resulting from not having emergency vehicles.

      So instead of being worried about the answer to the problem, we try to get rid of the problem (or majority of the problem) in the first place.

      Just as we aren't supposed to move around in metal boxes, I also don't think that we are supposed to live in arctic climates.

      I think that in the past before cars, people didn't need to get around very far, and they didn't feel a need to "see the world" like we do today.

      Delete
  2. On a similar note to Erin's above, commuting would obviously become much slower. For example, it takes me a half hour in car to commute to Frederick (about 30 miles away). On horse, it may take me a couple hours to reach Frederick. On foot, probably half a day at a constant, normal pace.

    How do you think you will solve this problem?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obviously getting rid of cars would drastically change the rest of the world as well. I am not proposing that we get rid of cars and try to keep everything else the same. I tried to stay focused on cars because if I started going off on tangents to address all of the other changes that should be made it would fill a book on the subject and this is just a blog.

      But yeah basically you just wouldn't have attended an institution in the first place that is 30 miles away.

      Delete
  3. There is quite a lot of problems with getting rid of vehicles.

    Firstly our entire food transportation system requires the use of vehicles. Most cities have food for only a couple days actually in them. removing all vehicles would result in the deaths of quite a substantial amount of people, mass chaos, panics, rioting, robberies etc...

    Secondly most of our modern medicines requires ingredients from different places(some from different countries or continents) and then requires it to be manufactured and then shipped to where ever you are located. This would result in the deaths of quite a lot of children (before the modern medicine age most children died in the first years of birth)

    Thirdly as mentioned in the previous comments getting to place to place would be quite difficult. In the olden days everything was located relatively closer to each other and trips into town might be a special once a week(or less) thing. The areas were all fairly self-sufficient and capable of producing what they needed to survive without going far from home. Our society is not like that now however because of the faster transportation.

    I could go on like this but the end result is the same. Every luxury, every advantage, even every necessity comes from the fact that we are able to travel around the world/countries/nation quickly. Very few of our goods come from nearby. Almost everything you use and own is either made in a different country or has parts that come from a different country.
    The resulting lose thereof would completely devastate the world's population (in at least all 1st world nations and any groups, such as some 3rd world country that gets aid from them,would be devastated)

    While it is easy to look at the negatives of our vehicles and assume they cause more harm than good they are the only way we are able to maintain our lives. Without them we could not sustain neither the population we have now, nor the technological advances.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have considered all of the effects there would be on the world as we know it and I know that they would be numerous.

      My idea may not be so much that we should immediately remove cars from our lives, but rather that they should never have become so integrated into our lives in the first place.

      We have gotten so used to the way that things are with our quick transportation that we cannot imagine slowing down (another student's reccomendation of how to improve the world).

      Basically my argument is that this is not the kind of world that I would like to maintain. Like I said in my main post, it all comes down to what you want to get out of life or "the meaning of life," which is an entirely different discussion.

      Delete
  4. I can see both sides to this argument, and am having a hard time deciding which I am most in favor of. I agree that our world has been so caught up in relying on the conveniences of technology. I think that these advances have helped our world in many ways, but also has become a problem in many ways.
    What would happen if the manufactures stopped making cars? No one would know what to do. We have become way to dependent on all the great modern conveniences of life. I personally would be ok with this because I have horses and would be able to travel. Although I agree this form of transportation would not be ideal, it would get me around. I do think that in the case of emergency vehicles that it would be beneficial to have cars, or at least helicopters.
    I think that we need to remember that cars have not been around that long. People have survived without them. It can be done. But people are becoming lazy and do not like to feel isolated from the world around them.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really liked your idea of banning cars for the sake of bettering the health in our society. Not to mention it would help the environment as well, and who doesn't like that? But I, along with everyone who has commented above, feel like getting rid of cars would be problematic as well. Our modern lives simply could not accommodate it.

    ReplyDelete