With all the strife, pain, and
suffering in the world, we often find ourselves asking what we can do
to make the world a better place.
I'm not proposing something radical,
like unifying the world under a single government; rather, my plan
involves people doing something very, very small: daily random acts
of kindness.
Throughout our history, we have often
wanted to build a better community: the “City on a Hill.” (Notice
that I said “better,” not “perfect”). Doing random and
meaningful acts of kindness will build that city, brick by brick.
But how would we achieve something so
radical and fundamentally in contrast to the greed that permeates the
heart and soul of every human being? Well, we can't force
people to be kind; that just takes all of the meaning out of the act.
We also can't give incentives to people for being kind; not only do
we not have enough money to do that (hello, deficit), but that's also
meaningless. (*Cough cough* tax deductions).
I think the most effective route would be if a
group of like-minded individuals gathered together and began doing such
acts of kindness. Through their example, others might be inspired to
participate, which would lead to a domino effect of exponential
kindness. A similar method (without such a focus on kindness) can be
seen in the development of the organization/zeitgeist Anonymous.
For those of you
not familiar with Anonymous, you may want to check this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_%28group%29 (Yeah,
it's Wikipedia, but I've managed to corroborate almost all of the
information in that article. Simply put, it's true. I am also willing to provide external corroborating links upon request).
These people had a
dream, they came together, and they acted on it. Now, as the Wikipedia page states, “In 2012, Time named Anonymous as one
of the most influential groups in the world.” If something so
powerful can come out of a meme on 4chan, imagine what a large group
of technologically linked people (minus the hacking, please) with a
shared commitment to kindness can accomplish. If we actually join
together, then a movement of charity could occur very easily.
Why should we try
something like this? Because people need help, regardless of who they
are, that's why. (Notice I didn't say “deserve”). Helping someone
at his or her moment of need is one of the best ways of making a
lasting impact on someone, especially a good one. And perhaps that
person will feel motivated to help another person later, which will
help to make the world even better.
“And
now abide faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these
is love.”
-
1 Corinthians 13:13 (NKJV)
"O stand, stand at the window
As the tears scald and start;
You shall love your crooked neighbor
With your crooked heart."
- W. H. Auden, "One Evening"
"O stand, stand at the window
As the tears scald and start;
You shall love your crooked neighbor
With your crooked heart."
- W. H. Auden, "One Evening"
(Headless photo taken from above Wikipedia link about Anonymous. Unity photo from farazairoz.blogspot.com)
This idea is highly commendable, but seems like a thoroughly idealistic hope. I have to admit a doubt in the capacity of human nature to allow something like this to have a true effect. Anonymous might have some effect, but awful things still happen all the time.
ReplyDeleteWhat of those who would take advantage of the system, living comfortably off the goodwill and charity of others without making real efforts of their own? What about criminal individuals and organizations that prey on charity? What about perfectly good people who are too proud to accept charity and would rather suffer? I don't wish to degrade charity. It is a worthy goal but it, like so many good things is so vulnerable to misuse. There are so many problems to consider, yes?
Thanks for raising those questions. They are very real issues, but there are ways to mitigate their effects. I'm not looking for everyone to be charitable (which I know was kind of the purpose of this exercise), but I can see many people doing it.
DeleteWe can diminish the number of those who take advantage of the system in many ways. Let's say you see a crippled man every day on the sidewalk. On days 1-6, you give him $5 (the proverbial "giving a man a fish to feed him for a day"). On day 7, you're feeling especially charitable, so you offer to help him find a job (the proverbial "teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime"). If he refuses, don't help him anymore. Harsh as it sounds, it's possibly the best course of action.
A shelter for homeless men in my town gives them a place to live and eat; however, there are conditions, one of which requires them to assist the mission and its thrift store during daytime hours. Eventually, the shelter helps them to find homes and jobs. Yes, these men are being helped, but this condition prevents them from free-riding. I think charitable organizations can do something like that to cut back on those who would exploit kindness.
I don't know much about criminals preying on charity, but I know charity can be a preemptive strike against crime. If you help someone to get him or her off the streets, there's a significantly lower chance that he or she will be drawn to crime.
I'm not really sure how to deal with people too proud to accept charity. I guess you just need to keep probing and hoping they'll accept. If they don't, sadly, you may need to just leave them be. Maybe someone else will come along later, and the people in need might accept his or her charity. If they're really, really in need, there's a better chance they'll ask for help.
And charity is really good for many reasons, not least of which is that good deeds do eventually come back to the Good Samaritan. It sounds corny, but it's true. I did some work helping people over the summer, and good deeds came back to me it bits and pieces, but they really came back in early January. And of course, the more charitable people there are, the better chance there is of your deed coming back to you.
Hey Sam, I agree that it is important for everyone to be united as one, in order to make the world a better place. Most times, people look for things in one another that serve only to divide, not unite. People working towards common good in my opinion would surely promote a better utopia for all! Nice writing by the way, I think you have excellent views on how to make the world a better place, or a better utopia. -Jesus
ReplyDeleteSam I really agree with you on this one.
ReplyDelete